Friday, April 27, 2012

Don't Be Afraid of Me


You know what I hate? The fear that people have of “me.” Not me, as in Vicki Stockton, though I am quite frightening at times, but rather the “me” as in “me, myself and I.” I can’t say I necessarily blame people for the fear of me. It’s kind of instilled while we are young.

Me: “Dad, can me and Missy go skating around the neighborhood?”

Dad: “It’s ‘Missy and I’. Would you say “Can me go skating around the neighborhood?”

Me: “No, I suppose not. So can she…er..her and I…errr..me…errr …can we go or not?”

If it happens enough, you start to fear “me.” So as a solution, you just start saying “I” for everything. It makes you feel smart.

Me: “Dad, Missy and I would like to purchase an Encyclopedia Brittanica set. She and I are particularly interested in the letter ‘B’.”

Dad: “Great! I will tell the salesman!”

But then, somewhere along the line, perhaps in late middle school, some teacher bursts your bubble.

Me: “Funny you should ask, teacher! I do know the average lifespan of the Black-capped Lory! I looked it up in the encyclopedia that my dad bought for Missy and I.”

Teacher: “It’s ‘Missy and me.’

For a burgeoning grammarian, this particular event in life is a real buzz kill.And it's a hassle. Because now every time you have two people appearing in a sentence, you have to take one of them out of the sentence, read it over in your head, then decide upon "me" or "I." It takes some time.

Me: "Hey, friend. Wanna come over to my house for a party?"

Friend: "Who all's coming?"

Me: (in my head) Just Missy and me. Remove Missy. Just me. Does that make sense? Just me is coming? That can't be right. Let's try this. Just Missy and I? Remove Missy. Just I?  Ahhh, fuck it. "A bunch of people."

And then, when you do it right, you often end up sounding like a pretentious Brit or an 18th Century Literature professor or something.

Business Meeting: "Who was it that wrote that last action item down?"

Me: "It was I." 

Yeah, that doesn't sound douche-baggy.


This process is difficult. I'm not gonna lie. This is why I do not judge too terribly harshly when English-speaking grownups muff up their use of "me" and "I," as was the case when I received THIS in an email from a director within my organization. 


I actually laud her style.  She's just old-schoolin' it. "Me and (name)." Circa 5th grade. I gotta say I was disappointed to find that the email was not signed "LYLAS." 

I forgive this lady. Granted, she's making a bazillion dollars more than I will ever make, but her style is organic. Real. Humble. 

You want to know who I do NOT forgive? The people who use "myself" as a  find-and-replace-all for the use of "me," "I," and "myself." Lazy a-holes! 

Me: "To whom should I send this document?"

Lazy A-Hole: "Send it to myself, and carbon copy James."

Me: "Oh, OK. I didn't know who all needed to see the document."

Lazy A-Hole: "Myself, along with James, will need to see it."

Seriously, people! MUST you annoy me with these "I am stupid, but I am going to use a two syllable word in place of a one syllable word in order to trick you into believing that not only am I not stupid, but am, in fact, smarter than you are" antics? Hrrrmph! Makes me want to kill...myself...errr....me....er....I. Ahhh, fuck it. "Makes me want to kill you."









3 comments:

Marc Schoenfeld said...

Good to see you back from Hiatus, Vicki! Hope you had a nice 6 years of unannoyed bliss. I noticed my webtracker showed a hit to my site from your site which I hadn't been to in a while and so came over to yours and was shocked to see today's date.

I have a theory on the incorrect grammar usage you finish with. It has to do with some innate human rhythmic satisfaction of speaking in that people feel like their sentence must flow well. So they adjust their words to make it longer to fill some time signature. My annoyance is similar with certain people always saying "Thank you so much!" always instead of just "Thank you" and I think it has to do with "Thank you" just feeling like it's too staccato and doesn't fill the musical time scale. In your example, perhaps "me" seems abrupt to the speak whereas the 2-syllable "myself" flows into the next clause better. Still annoying, I agree. If we adjust our language to flow better, we are then going down the slippery-slope to the French way of life.

I look forward to what annoyances you will skewer in the future.

Voluminous Vicki said...

Marc -- yay! I had to start this back up cuz there was a whole lotta hate building up inside me after 6 years of bottling it up. Actually, I think it has something to do with my going back to work after being home with my littlest one for 4 years. Something about being in the presence of adults that really brings out the hate in me. I think your theory of the "rhythmic satisfaction" is spot-on. LOL on the French reference. Oooh la la!

p.s. I see that you haven't been hating for a couple of years on your site. Did you lose interest in the site, or are you a lover of all things now?

Marc Schoenfeld said...

That makes sense. Yeah, work is the number one frustration producer, so I understand how it would inspire you to start up again.

No, I didn't stop being annoyed, but I have slowed down the pace substantially. Had a couple nice job quittings and long vacations which mellowed me out a bit. Here's my more recent list.

http://annoy.marcschoenfeld.com